A Reminder: Fair Rent Deserves Fair Living Conditions

A Reminder: Fair Rent Deserves Fair Living Conditions

Hi landlords,

Just sharing a polite reminder — especially for those managing shared properties or renting out rooms in high-demand areas like East London.

As tenants, we’re happy to pay fair rent — but that should come with fair, legal, and safe living conditions. That means:

  • Adequate space (not cramming two people into a single room)
  • Clear written tenancy agreements
  • HMO compliance where required
  • Safe, hygienic, and well-maintained properties

Most landlords do the right thing, and tenants respect that. But when corners are cut, it damages trust — and the entire market suffers.

Fair rent isn’t just about price — it’s about respecting people’s right to live decently.

Thanks to those who are already setting a good example.

2 Likes

I don’t really get your purpose posting here. LLs that care about “fair, legal and safe living conditions” don’t need a “polite reminder”. LLs that don’t care need a legal challenge and don’t give a fig about a “polite reminder”.

What were you hoping to achieve?

1 Like

Hi Tatemono, thanks for the reply.

You’re right !!! those who break the law often don’t care. …..

But public forums like this are also about awareness, solidarity, and community standards.

This post wasn’t meant to lecture good landlords, it’s a message of encouragement, a reminder to tenants and new or “unaware landlords”, and a who might not know their rights or obligations .

Sometimes a respectful voice is enough to make someone think twice. And if not, at least the conversation stays visible.

Here you are preaching to the converted . In the UK there are about 2 .5 million private individual landlords. How many of them contribute regular to this forum or even know about it ? 50/ 100 ? at the most .!! The bad landlords are under the radar, you will not reach them, as they are not bothered

3 Likes

“Don’t like it? Move.”
“Yeah, it’s broken — we’ll fix it soon.”
“Oh, by the way, the house was sold , you need to move out tomorrow.”

This isn’t just unfair … it’s unstable and disrespectful.
People pay good money for any roof over their heads and that roof should at least be safe, legal, and livable.
They deserve more than excuses or last-minute shocks.

A lot of landlords (often through agents) do pay for HMO licences or other council fees , but many don’t even know what those charges are really for.
Let’s be honest: most of it feels like a revenue stream for councils rather than a system that protects tenants or makes owners compliant .

Because in practice over 50%, even licensed properties often lack:

  • Fire safety checks
  • Written tenancy agreements
  • Proper tenant information packs
  • Or even a clear point of contact
  • Control on the number of tenants in the property
  • Waste Management

So here’s a thought: instead of constantly passing costs onto tenants, maybe landlords should be asking what they’re actually getting in return from the council.
If there’s no real enforcement or accountability, where is the value?

And if being a landlord has become so hard or unprofitable, maybe it’s time to sell — and let someone else step in who can do things properly.
There are plenty of responsible landlords and buyers out there who follow the rules, provide decent homes, and still make a fair return.

Holding on just to cut corners helps no one — especially not the people trying to live there.

So again, the honest question:
If licensing doesn’t lead to real standards being enforced across all landlords, what’s the point? Who actually benefits?

Because from the tenant’s side, it often feels like there are no basic legal rights, But I’m very aware there is .

Said with full respect — we all have responsibilities in this system. Let’s make sure your landlod neighbour meet them.

You have a bee in your bonnet ,so come on , what has happened to you?

I’ve got so many other things to care about than this. Selective licensing just came into an area where I have two properties. The area is almost entirely rental properties and one of the most deprived. We purposefully bought there in order to provide decent homes for a fair rent because we knew that there were rogue LLs ripping people off in that area. That was 20 years ago.

Licensing came in last year. OK it’s another expense and my Ts will suck up some of that cost. I’ve been giving my Ts decent, affordable, safe, warm homes for decades.

I do not have time to police the council on their newly imposed licensing scheme. If it doesn’t work, that matters not one jot to me because I’ll keep on doing what I’ve been doing.

The council you have a beef with are not listening to these forum posts. Neither are the rogue LLs who make licensing necessary.

So, again, I don’t get the purpose of you posting here… esp as it’s now the council you want to give a “polite reminder” to. :roll_eyes:

1 Like

I can’t help but think there’s a sales pitch coming

1 Like

Who actually benefits??? That is very easy to answer , not the landlord , he has to pay. Not the tenant,the rent will be higher. WOW that means the local authority gains thru extra tax off the landlord . Well who would have thought that would be the case.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.