I don’t know about illegal, but it’s certainly flawed. Here is what they say about Deposits:
Managing a MyDeposits Deposit During a Renewal
If your deposit is protected with our new deposit provider, MyDeposits, we’ll automatically notify MyDeposits of any tenants who have been added to, or removed from, the tenancy. This means that your deposit record will automatically be updated.
Therein lies the problem. Then they say:
However, as the landlord, you’ll still be responsible for releasing and re-protecting any share of the deposit.
If a Tenant Is Leaving the Tenancy:
If any of the tenants named on the original tenancy agreement are leaving the property you, as the landlord, will need to release their share of the deposit to them.
Before releasing a tenant’s share of the deposit we recommend that you order a Check Out Report to take account of any damage that has occurred during the tenancy period and make any necessary deductions from the existing deposit. Ordering a Check Out Report ensures that all tenants cover their share of damage fairly.
Once you’ve agreed to any deductions for damage you can release the former tenant(s) share of the deposit through your [MyDeposits account]If you’d like further assistance on repaying the deposit please contact MyDeposits directly: businessdevelopment@mydeposits.co.uk 0333 321 9404
If a New Tenant Is Replacing a Former Tenant:
Follow the steps above to release the former tenant’s share of the deposit.
Before the new tenant moves in we’d recommend that you carry out a full inventory inspection of the property. A new inventory at this point gives an accurate record of the state of the property when the new tenant moves in and helps reduce the risk of disputes later.
After everyone’s agreed to the new inventory you should ask the new tenants to pay their share of the deposit. Once you’ve received their share you’ll have 30 days to [protect it] along with the rest of the deposit.
Etc.etc
The first problem is that OR “automatically notify My Deposits of any tenants who have been added to or removed from the tenancy. This means that your deposit record will automatically be updated.” (followed by “However, as the landlord, you’ll still be responsible for releasing and re-protecting any share of the deposit.”)
What is not taken into account is that My Deposits does not split deposits. So if a deposit is released, ALL of it goes back to the lead tenant. That lead tenant is then responsible for passing on her out-going co-tenant’s deposit to her.
[Even if My Deposits DID treat tenant’s deposits separately, because MyD have received notice, as above, to change the names (replace new tenant with out-going tenant), the out-going tenant is wiped from the record before any release can take place, so there’s no longer any ex-tenant to return a deposit to.]
I called My Deposits. They said the existing ‘lead’ tenant and the ‘new’ tenant deposits were now both protected. I said the new tenant hasn’t paid a deposit yet, even though he’s named on the Certificate already.
They said he could pay his deposit to the out-going tenant.
In other words I did not need to ‘release the deposit’ to the ‘lead tenant’, trust her to pass on the out-going tenant’s deposit, and request and re-register new deposits from her and the new tenant.
I asked MyD if that was legal, and they said it was.
In our particular case, the in-coming tenant is friends with the out-going tenant, so this can be achieved quite straightforwardly, the alternative being me having to ask in-coming for a deposit and see that this went to the out-going, rather than the more complicated path suggested by OR. Not that I wouldn’t trust the existing tenant to return her friend’s deposit, but what a load of faff to deal with when she’s about to negotiate changes to utility bills with in-coming, among other things.
I’ve seen a couple of your other posts, David, you are a stickler for legalities, which is great. The issue would be that the new tenant would obviously like a contract. Otherwise, we were all on a rolling contract (until the out-going got on a course at Manchester). The Renewal process certainly allowed this.
And I can also see that Open Rent’s Renewal process tries to cover both landlord and tenant against dispute with regards to deposit, with particular attention to Inventory.
But it seems glaringly obvious they don’t account for the fact that MyDeposits does not consider separate deposits that contribute to what you might call a ‘joint tenancy’ and prefers to have a lead tenant responsible for everything, eg having one person named responsible for the entire deposit . That is surely a problem with the government scheme? Or is that normal?
It’s simply not possible to release the deposit of a non-lead tenant via My Deposits.
So, with the info provided by Open Rent, it is not an easy process to figure out – as why would I try to collect a deposit from someone who’s already named on the Protection Certificate? Why would I try to release a deposit from someone who no longer exists?
The fact that we had thought of a way round it, for the new tenant to forward their deposit to the ex-tenant, is not a concept suggested by Open Rent, perhaps because it doesn’t ‘sound’ legal.
MyD’s initial response was to ask Open Rent and eventually gave the advice above, but when OR finally replied to my queries (after I’d already called MyD - hanging on the phone for bloody ages) they said “call My Deposits”.
Obviously I’ve relayed my dissatisfaction to Lisa, one of several Open Rent operators all of us have spoken to in the last two days. My ‘lead’ tenant was told she had been “escalated to a landlord specialist” when making the same enquiries as me. I didn’t get any escalation, just the usual inadequate links.