Section 8 ground 1

I need to move back in to my tenanted property: sold my house, moved in with partner but it’s not working so I need to move. I lived in the tenanted property when I first bought it, for 4 years, since then (9 years) it’s been tenanted.

If I evict using s8 g1, is there a restriction on marketing it FOR SALE thereafter, or just reletting it and marketing for rent. I can’t see myself living there forever but I definitely need to move back in there asap.

I’ve tried looking online but it’s not clear, to me anyway. I really don’t want to get this wrong. Thanks.

@Birdy

Read the RRA guidance from gov uk

The restriction on letting is if you use the s8 repossession ground that relates to living in or selling the property (1 or 1A)

Best

-

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords serving a Section 8 notice under Ground 1 (to move in) or Ground 1A (to sell) face strict, legally binding restrictions on re-letting or marketing the property

See eg

The restricted period for Grounds 1 and 1A

If a landlord uses Ground 1 (moving in) or Ground 1A (selling up), there is a restricted period during which they cannot re-let the property, grant a licence to occupy for money (for example, on a holiday let platform), or even market the property for letting.

The restricted period begins when the four-month Section 8 notice is served and ends 12 months after the earliest date for possession proceedings specified in the notice.

Since the notice period for these grounds is four months, this means in practice at least 16 months from the date the notice is served.

Breaching the restricted period is a criminal offence under section 16J. It is also an offence for someone else to do it on the landlord’s behalf, for example a letting agent, unless they can prove they took all reasonable steps to avoid it.

The penalties are the same: up to £40,000 as an alternative to prosecution, or an unlimited fine on conviction. And the tenant can apply for a rent repayment order.

This means that if a landlord uses Ground 1A to sell a property with vacant possession but is unable to sell, they will need to wait at least 16 months from when they served the notice they can re-let or market the property.

They will need to be motivated sellers as it is a long time to have a property sitting empty.

Thanks, I’ve seen that but I’m still not clear if “marketing” here means for sale or only remarketing for rental.

What don’t you understand about this?

So scenario: I use s8 g1, tenant moves out at end of 4m, I move in. I know I can’t then remarket for rental till 12 months restricted period is up, but what if for eg I need to move house within that time for work? Can I sell/remarket for sale within the restricted period?

No I’d be using s8 g1 as I need to move back in. But am I then bound to stay there for a minimum of 12m or can I sell it in that time?

I completely understand the restricted period for reletting following use of s8 g1 or g1 a, but I’m not planning to re let, ever, I want to move back in, only, principal, main residence, but I’m not sure at what stage after that I’m “free” to sell it.

It says "but is unable to sell’ implying you can try to sell.

The purpose of the restriction is to stop LLs using a ground that says they want to sell or to move in to evict tenants then rent to others. Not to stop you being able to sell

If concerned, serve on both grounds with evidence for both eg appoint a solicitor and estate agent as well

Thank you, I’m pretty sure I underStand the purpose of the restricted period. I was trying to work out if in an extreme situation, where for eg I used s8 g1 and moved back in, then tried to sell within 12m, would I be technically vulnerable to a challenge for using the wrong ground (ie should have used g1A).

What period of time between me moving back in and putting it up for sale would avoid this?

I think key to my understanding of this is the definition of “marketing”. Is this “marketing for rental” or “putting up for sale?”

@stellabird2011

I don’t think there’s a defined period if you used a ground saying you will move back in and you do so you haven’t used the wrong ground. @david122 might know more about exactly what RRA defines as moving in

So long as you do actually move back in and live there (so you get post there, pay utilities there, have furniture there, stay there overnight ) I’d think it would be ok but there must be some common sense too - if you “moved back in” for 1 night only I’d guess that might not qualify in the eyes of a judge. Given it takes c 12-14 weeks from offer to completion for most property sales and you’d have to market first, surely you are expecting to be there a few months anyway. If you plan putting on the market soon after possession use the right grounds.

Best

It’s marketing for rental.

You can’t have a ground which says you are getting possession to sell then have a restriction on being able to sell for 12 months.

As I said the purpose of the restriction is to stop LLs using these grounds then renting to different tenants

Thank you. No I’d def be properly moving in, council tax, all my furniture, the lot, and sleeping there every night (can’t wait). It’s just work is a bit precarious and if I have to move for a new job I don’t want to be stuck for the 12m if I don’t have to. Thanks for your help. :+1:t3:

I wonder how all this will be policed.

1 Like

( @Howard1 good question)

@Birdy well the safest thing would be to seek possession on both grounds if you have evidence for both. That would maybe be sensible for someone planning to move in just for a month to decorate ahead of selling who had definite plans to put a property on the market soon after moving back.

Think if you used moving in as grounds then actually sold instead, whom is going to know? Suppose a former tenant complained to the council. I guess they might consider whether you had knowingly used the wrong grounds (which is an offence) or illegally evicted the tenant. But may be hard to prove and easy to refute if you did actually move in for a reasonable period.

Good luck

@Birdy

and just to confirm, for the period during which the period mustnt be relet or marketed below is set out exactly what a LL can’t do during the period it mustnt be re-let and during the period it mustnt be marketed - and the fines/penalties [see shelter page extract below which gives every source Shelter Legal - Possession when a landlord wants to sell or move in - Shelter England ]

best


--

When the property must not be re-let

During the restricted period, a private landlord must not:[13]

  • grant a residential tenancy

  • permit a person to occupy the property under a licence for money

A private landlord who has used ground 1 can re-let the property during the restricted period to:[14]

  • a qualifying family member

  • another tenant or licensee where a qualifying family member occupies the property as their only or principal home

A qualifying family member includes the family members listed in ground 1.

When the property must not be marketed

During the restricted period, a landlord must not market or authorise another person to market the property to be:[15]

  • let under a residential tenancy

  • occupied under a licence for money

A person markets the property if they:[16]

  • advertise that a property is or may be available to be occupied

  • inform any other person that the property is or may be available, in the course of letting agency work

When the restrictions do not apply

The restrictions do not apply if the landlord used ground 1A and the letting or marketing is to a licensee who has agreed to:[17]

  • purchase the landlord’s interest in the property

  • lease the property for a term of more than 21 years without a break clause, and the license to occupy is granted in anticipation

Shared ownership

The restrictions do not apply after the landlord uses ground 1A for some shared ownership properties where the landlord intends to assign the shared ownership lease.[18]

If the tenancy existed before 1 May 2026, the landlord must give a written statement to the tenant that the landlord is a shared owner by 31 May 2026.[19]

Where the tenancy starts on or after 1 May 2026, the landlord must give the written statement to the tenant before the tenancy starts.[20]

When a landlord can receive a financial penalty

A landlord or their representative could be subject to a financial penalty for breaching the rules for ground 1 or ground 1A.[21]

Legal representatives are exempt from enforcement action.[22]

Financial penalties for misuse of grounds

A landlord can be subject to a financial penalty if both:[23]

  • they rely on a ground where they do not reasonably believe they can gain possession

  • the tenant gives up the tenancy within 4 months of the notice, without a possession order

For example, the landlord serves a notice on ground 1 or ground 1A, knowing that the criteria for the ground is not met, and the tenant leaves the property during the notice period.

The maximum penalty is £7,000.[24]

When a financial penalty cannot be imposed

A financial penalty cannot be imposed if:[25]

  • the person has already been convicted of an offence for the same conduct

  • criminal proceedings have been started but not concluded

  • criminal proceedings have concluded and the person was not convicted

A local authority must have regard to any government guidance when imposing financial penalties.[26]

When a landlord commits an offence

A landlord might commit a criminal offence if they breach the rules on ground 1 or ground 1A.

A person who is prosecuted and found guilty of one of these offences can be fined up to a maximum of £40,000.[27]

Re-letting or marketing during the restricted period

A landlord or their representative commits an offence if they re-let or market the property during the 12 month restricted period.[28]

It is a defence for a person other than the landlord who markets or authorises a person to market the property if they can show they took all reasonable steps to avoid contravening it. For example, a letting agent who was not aware that the property was in the restricted period.[29]

A person does not commit an offence if they only publish an advert or provide a means by which a prospective landlord and tenant can communicate.[30] For example, online property portals.

Knowingly and recklessly misusing a possession ground

A landlord or their representative is guilty of an offence where both:[31]

  • they rely on a possession ground, either knowing or being reckless as to whether the landlord can gain possession on the ground

  • the tenant surrenders the tenancy within four months of the notice, and no possession order is made

Where a financial penalty has been imposed

A landlord or their representative is guilty of an offence where:[32]

  • a financial penalty has been imposed and the final notice imposing the penalty has not been withdrawn

  • the conduct causing the penalty continues after the period of 28 days, starting with the day after the penalty was imposed, or if the person appeals against the final notice, the day after the appeal is determined or withdrawn

Repeated breaches within five years

A landlord or their representative is guilty of an offence where:[33]

  • they have received a financial penalty or been convicted of an offence

  • within five years they commit another breach for which a financial penalty can be made

Financial penalties for offences as an alternative to prosecution

A local authority can impose a financial penalty as an alternative to prosecution if it is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the landlord or their representative is guilty of an offence.[34]

The offences include:

  • re-letting the property in the restricted period after using ground 1 or ground 1A

  • marketing the property in the restricted period after using ground 1 or ground 1A

  • continued or repeated breaches of tenancy law

The maximum amount of a financial penalty as an alternative to prosecution is £40,000.[35]

Find out more about local authority enforcement duties.

Rent repayment orders for ground 1 or 1A breaches

An occupier or local authority can apply for a rent repayment order against a landlord who has:[36]

  • breached rules on letting or marketing property during the restricted period

  • knowingly or recklessly misused a possession ground

A tenant or local authority can apply for up to a maximum of two years’ rent. The application must be made within two years of the offence.

Find out more about rent repayment orders.

Last updated: 1 May 2026

Shelter Legal - Possession when a landlord wants to sell or move in - Shelter England

@Howard1 good question, and one that worries a lot of landlords.

The enforcement mechanism works roughly like this. If a tenant believes Ground 1 or 1A was used in bad faith, they can complain to the local housing authority. Councils have powers under the RRA to investigate and impose civil penalties on landlords who use possession grounds fraudulently. The maximum penalty can be significant.

Separately, the tenant can apply to the First-tier Tribunal for compensation if they can show the ground was used without reasonable grounds. The FTT can award up to 52 weeks of rent in such cases.

In practice, enforcement will vary a lot by council. Some are active on housing issues, many are under-resourced. For a landlord like @Birdy with a genuine reason to move back in, the practical risk is low as long as there is evidence of actual occupation: council tax registration, electoral roll, correspondence sent to that address, bank statements. Those create a clear paper trail that makes a bad faith claim very hard to sustain.

The restriction period for re-letting is what really matters for genuine cases. If stellabird moves in as her main home and then later needs to sell for work reasons, that is a different ground being exercised at a later date from a genuinely different situation.

1 Like

If you evict using ground 1 and re-occupy, I dont believe there is then any restriction on selling. Ive not had time to check this thoroughly, so you should check with a solicitor or landlord association before going ahead.