Hi.
I believe there to be a bigger issue here with brokers and insurers, landlords and non landlords. Most importantly a cautionary tale to all landlords - albeit not a directly related issue.
My experience was not with open rent per se, but was a step further.
My ex tenant made a cannabis plant out of my property. There were exhaustive checks on the tenant. These were accepted by the legal part of the insurer.
Apart from having to go through the FCS to get loss of income, which they refused to cover initially, my legal cover refuses to start civil proceedings to recover damages.
In context, my ex tenant is awaiting criminal trial.
My legal insurers refuse to take this to court because there is “a less than 50% chance of winning”.
If the police are bringing a criminal case, and have a chance to win why are the insurer/ broker refusing? I’ll answer this, cost.
I have asked for proof of how the legal insurers estimate 50%. No answer, and another escalation to the FCS.
To sum up, you have a good defence, but ultimately if anything major happens, you are on your own.
I invite you to read Marin Lewis reporting on the Which report which sums up insurers of not paying out for travel and car insurance. Akin to what is happening to landlords also.
Good luck and keep on pestering.
There should be a nationwide body against brokers and insurers not just the FCS who were as bad or worse to deal with than the brokers/ insurers.
Everything and all conversations in writing as they tend to lose recorded calls.
Good luck!