Court documents tampered with

Hello my 2nd post

It’s all very complex but to start with just one of the huge issues

how will the judge respond to my landlord editing/ adding/ deleating amending the AST the AST has been tampered with and is not the same as my copy

The landlord has not provided a signed copy

I have evidence and provided a true copy
That is signed and initialed by myself and gaurontour on every page

There are many other false truths within the claim but this is a false/tampered document the AST

These are documents that have been filled at the court

It is very clear that the document provided has been tampered with and I have clearly evidence it as such

Many thanks

I assume that you’re talking about eviction proceedings? If so, then just make sure you attend the court hearing with your evidence and inform the judge or the duty solicitor if there is one. What sort of amendments have been made? Is this a s21 claim or a s8 claim and if so which grounds?

How can you be sure that is the case?

Because I have the original copy
And the then landloards is just a printed copy

My copy is initialled by two people 6 pages at the end of each page by all parties

and my final page my copy is signed by all parties

The landlords copy is nothing but a word document that has been edited and printed off

I can see where words have need added / paragraphs added and the signature headings edited and one section deleted

I have used a highlighter pen and evidence all the changes

Which I believe are for a gain

How long till judge will lol at it all it’s the excelorated court process

I will follow David122’s comments. There should be just one document across all parties and duly signed.

As I thought my copy

I have provided to the courts is a photo copy of the original true document i got at sign up

I have original at home to take to court

Will wait to see what the judge decides

I wonder if he may call a hearing as my copy is the only true copy

It’s section 21. With various defence including breach of housing act section 11
The list could go on but it’s to much to type

Is it 4-6 weeks till judge will get round to looking at the case?

Breach of s11 repairing obligations is not in itself a defence against s21. Almost all s21 defences are procedural/administrative. The exception is the retaliatory eviction defence, which occurs where a tenant notified the landlord in writing of a significant property hazard, (category 1 or 2) and the landlord later served a s21 in retaliation without addressing the hazard.

There’s no valid gas check been done this year

Will just have to wait and see
I guess

Thanks

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.