I am in dispute with a highly unreasonable landlord regarding return of deposit. Just to give an idea, they are demanding 100% of refurbishment costs - after almost five years of living in the flat. They are now claiming £18k of costs on a tenancy of £3k per month so ist has become serious.
Landlord refused to use the TDS adjudicator service. My point is that using the adjudicator would have avoided all legal costs. However, landlord argues that the adjudicator cannot make awards of more than the deposit.
In order to make my point, I would need to know what information you get from the adjudicator in case the costs of damages exceed the deposit amount.
Are they just telling you something along the lines of “The sum of damaged attributable to the tenant exceed the deposit”, or do they give you an assessment, line by line based on the check-out report, what the reasonable repair cost of the damage is and who is responsible for it (even if the total amount exceeds the deposit)?
It would be absolutely great if someone who has used the adjudicator in a deposit dispute could give me a (redacted) example of exactly what information you get back.
Thank you very much!