I’m trying to understand the definition of a HMO and, whilst it’s often clear cut, there are a couple of scenarios where I’m not quite so sure and it would be good to get clarity:
3 people - an unmarried couple sharing with the sister of one of the couple
3 people - an unmarried couple sharing with an unrelated friend of one of the couple
2 people - both friends but unrelated
Can anyone please advise?
(Assume two bedroom with shared bathroom, kitchen and lounge)
Scenario 1 and 2 are both HMO’s. Whether they are licensable or not will depend on the local authority.
The government definition is ;
A house in multiple occupation (HMO) is a property rented out by at least 3 people who are not from 1 ‘household’ (for example a family) but share facilities like the bathroom and kitchen. It’s sometimes called a ‘house share’.
That makes sense however there is a second part to the definition you linked to:
A household consists of either a single person or members of the same family who live together. It includes people who are married or living together and people in same-sex relationships.
In a scenario where A and B are a couple and live with C (who is the sister of B), B appears to be living in a single occupancy household - because they are related to C and living together with A.
I agree mi62014. I remember Tessa Shepperson did a little training video on all this. Scenario 1 is not an HMO as they all relate through B. If there were 4 people, where D was partner to C, and C or B left the houseshare, the relationships fall apart and it becomes an HMO. Weird because you would think 4 people is a more risky set up fire-wise than 3 people, but I believe that is the case!
andrew8 is spot on. an hmo is essentially non related people not forming a “family” group whom share some facilities. …then you get into is it 3 storey, are there 5+ people , is there a safety case etc. so its smart to talk to the council and they do actually vary between councils