Complex tenant and agent issue

Rented house that is let by my tenant,I am the landlord, who is UK based, but split time in the UK as away working overseas, so I rent through a small managing agent and thinking of moving to OpenRent. This tenancy started on 1 October 2025 as an assured shorthold tenancy (AST), fixed term 12 months.

My tenant, single father with two young children (one child has developed a chronic cough during the tenancy). Rent paid by Universal Credit top-up deposit paid at start, £1,650 (6 weeks’ rent). The tenant is a vulnerable tenant (limited English, on benefits).

My agent accepted the deposit but failed to register it in a deposit protection scheme or provide the required prescribed information. They then later transferred the deposit to a new agent, but did not inform the tenant or the scheme (if one had been used as no evidence the deposit was ever protected).

My tenant reported persistent damp and black mould in the master bedroom and hallway; he also complained of intermittent electrical flickering and occasional tripping of sockets. The agent acknowledged the report but put repairs off repeatedly citing “funding problems” and saying the landlord is “charging up funds”, which is not true.

The agent could not produce an electrical installation condition report (EICR) for the property when asked for it. They said they “haven’t needed one” and only provided a gas safety certificate.

The property’s most recent EPC (energy performance certificate) issued in 2020 shows an EPC F. No improvement works were completed and no exemption was registered.

My tenant’s child’s GP records show repeated respiratory infections and the GP wrote a note attributing symptoms to damp/mould exposure. My tenant emailed the agent and threatened to withhold rent if the problem is not fixed. The agent replied “do not withhold rent.”

As a landlord I served a Section 21 notice giving two months’ notice claiming possession because I want to sell the property. The agent emailed the tenant the notice but does not provide evidence of deposit protection, nor any recent EICR or work orders.

A property manager from the current agent attended in person and told my tenant “If you don’t accept the notice, we’ll escalate and you’ll have to pay for the damp remediation.” The manager later attempted to change the locks while the tenant was out, but did not complete the eviction.

My tenant called the pertinent Environmental Health team and they inspected and recorded a category 1 HHSRS hazard for damp/mould (serious risk). They advised that enforcement action may follow but say they are short staffed.

Now the government has abolished Section 21 no fault evictions with a future commencement date

of May 2026. Also, government guidance expanded electrical safety requirements and indicates mandatory electrical testing for rented homes. MEES rules have also tightened, with public guidance aiming for higher EPC minimum by 2030. There is also an ongoing legislative package around deposit handling; a Protection of Tenants’ Deposits Bill was published in 2025 which would change deposit registration and transferring obligations, but not yet fully in force.

Before any remedial action, I have listed the house for sale at auction and posted an advert priced significantly higher as I may repair and re let at market rent. No repair remediation has been done. The agent has emailed my tenant and offered “Accept a surrender and leave by … and we’ll agree a reduced outstanding charge”, unclear whether this is a genuine offer.

I cannot afford a Solicitor so researching then looking for professional free advice after I know a bit more as all new to me.

I need help answering what are the tenant’s immediate rights the day after the attempted lock change? What criminal and civil remedies are available immediately? Which remedy should be sought first and why?

Is the Section 21 notice valid? If not, why not, and does the impending Renters’ Rights Act affect the assessment?

Also given the HHSRS category 1 finding, what specific notices can the local authority issue, on what legal basis, and what are my likely legal responses/defences? Which public law or statutory powers are the local authorities likely to use?

What is the legal significance of the missing EICR? Can I be forced to produce an EICR right now, what statutory instrument or guidance would that be under? How could the missing EICR be used tactically in court?

How does the EPC F and MEES situation affect my ability to continue letting? Is there an immediate prohibition to rely on? What enforcement bodies and sanctions could be engaged?

What’s the exact paperwork and witness statements they could prepare for an urgent interim injunction application to stop an illegal eviction and compel remediation. Which courts and orms would they use?

If the deposit was indeed never protected, what remedies are available to the tenant and what are the priorities and likely monetary outcomes.

If the local authority says they cannot act for a while due to capacity. What can the tenant do in the interim to protect themselves?

What are the reputational, regulatory and financial risks to the letting agent and myself?

When the Renters’ Rights Act commences in May 2026, how would outcomes differ for the tenant and what additional remedies/defences would be available retrospectively?

1 Like

@barrybartram a s21

Nightmare for tenant and you sorry to hear about

Moving to OR won’t solve they are not a lettings agent and won’t deal with any of those past issues for you. They will only work with new AST issued by them which would mean ending old AST returning deposit starting new one for which you’ll need to serve an EPC, eicr, gas safety certificate. Why would tenant agree to that when you’ve served a s21?

Cant afford a solicitor? what about the costs if you cant sell your place? Think this through.

Professional free advice? Which professionals do you use that give advice for free?

your initial research - try joining a landlord association like nrla - they have a lot of advice available for not much [compared with a solicitor]

All the liabilities are yours even if agent made mistake - see case of a recent politician

Don’t understand why your focus appears to be on rights and liabilities not actually sorting the problems in your property right away now you know former agent didnt.

Talk direct to tenant and apologize for former and current agents behaviour which was unacceptable.

change agents again asap - your current has tried illegally eviction by changing locks (which you would be liable for and is a criminal offence) and harassment and blatant untruths (not complying with s21 wouldn’t mean tenant responsible for costs of remedying mould) - this won’t reflect well on you when it comes up in court that you kept such an agent. Report them and their predecessors to any professional body they claim to be a member of. Explain situation to new agents

Get an eicr asap (cost around 100 quid) and any remedying works done- now you know its not been done and tenant reporting tripping this is an immediate safety issue. If you don’t provide a valid EICR certificate, you could face fines up to £30,000, enforcement notices from your local council, and invalidated insurance. Just get it done asap

Get the mould issues sorted asap too - you are going to have to do it to be able to sell the place anyway and now you’ve been told it’s serious why wait for them to tell you to do it. You are legally responsible for providing a place that is habitable why would you not get it sorted now you know there is a problem. There’s no excuse. Why would you refuse unless you had evidence it’s tenants fault (ie caused by condensation and tenant doesn’t ventilate by opening windows or use extractor fans - if there was no mould under previous tenants for example). If it’s caused by penetrating damp (faulty gutters etc) or a leaking pipe it will be damaging property structure and your responsibility to fix (and reducing value of house). Potentially like other repairs tenant could get done and charge you via reduced rent. Do you have inventory photos showing whether mould was present at start of tenancy? If you think caused by tenant give them advice on how to avoid mould and damp there’s lots online and you want to help them deal and stop it getting any worse

No buyer even at auction is going to buy with tenant in situ and the issues you have which have to be disclosed - maybe get a new s21 but make sure it’s done properly and will be valid this time (get legal advice)

try googling ‘citizens advice If you get a ‘section 21’ eviction notice’ and ‘shelter Section 21 eviction’ and ‘shelter When landlords cannot use a section 21 notice’ which will explain why your s21 not valid

deposit not registered in a scheme - compensation is up to 3x deposit. The court may decide that you will not have to leave the property when the tenancy ends if your landlord has not used a TDP scheme when they should have.

[google ‘tenant deposit protection: if your landlord does not protect your deposit’ and ‘citizens advice if your landlord didnt follow deposit rule

Get legal advice but probably best to return full deposit

You might have a case against former agents if they’ve not providing services advertised/in your contract with them

Extra powers for LA enforcement/higher fines under RRA come into force in December so will already be affecting your case.

Don’t worry about any worse /more severe punishment from may 26 get it all sorted well before then - worry about meeting your responsibilities under existing legislation.

Even with a valid s21 can take long time to evict (6 months has been mentioned by others on this forum) and courts will be clogged with others trying to get s21 before may26 makes impossible to use that.

Last as you say new to all this..read your AST contract and read up to understand what your responsibilities are as a landlord - there’s lots about this online , training from nrla as part of their membership, look at the ‘independent landlord’ website/blog. Sorry if obvious

Good luck

It sounds like you’ve broken every rule and law in the book . Engage expert legal advice .

2 Likes

wow… can’t believe an actual “rogue landlord” would come here for advice.

Well, seeing as you’re here, my advice would be to pay the tenant not only all their rent and deposit back but also compensation for the life-threatening health risks you have exposed them to. That would include covering their costs for moving to another property fit for habitation.

Then bar yourself from ever letting property again.

1 Like

@tatemono

To be fair to @barrybartram he seems to be saying it’s all the fault of his agents he appointed because he’s often overseas. And thinking of moving to OR so appears to want to do things properly.

Tho also plans selling up so may realize this LL stuff is harder than leaving to an agent and hoping all will be ok.

@barrybartram

Google

‘cse condensation damp and mould’

And

‘nea Dealing with condensation and mould’

And

‘Shelter Damp and mould problems in private rented homes’

We are all responsible for the ‘professionals’ we employ.

You need to check the credentials of the expert letting / management agent you are now employing, and also check with a solicitor where you stand legally re the current situation.

1 Like

Your s21 is invalid on multiple counts. You probably won’t be able to fix then all before s21 is off the statute books. If you dont deal with the urgent damp and electrical issues you will probably face a large fine. Unless you get lucky with a buyer who does no checks, then whether you can afford it or not, if you dont get help from a specialist landlord and tenant solicitor or an eviction company, you will struggle to extracte yourself from this situation.

1 Like

I am not sure why you feel so superior and why you feel it is OK to be so disrespectful to a new landlord, that put his trust in the advice of an agent. As for “blame” that seems to be your department, as I took free legal advice from professionals at a law centre and they advised the following, which is respectful and useful, so I will follow their advice not your rant.

I copy pasted this from their email and preserved privacy with a few minor changes.

They understand a Section 21 notice was served and that my agent issued verbal instructions that the tenant must vacate as well as the attempted lock change.

They advised, the notice is invalid, due to:

failure to protect the tenancy deposit (s213 Housing Act 2004), failure to serve prescribed information, lack of valid electrical safety certification, presence of Category 1 hazards and outstanding disrepair (s33 Deregulation Act 2015 retaliatory eviction provisions). They said attempting to rely on the notice any further exposes me to potential unlawful eviction prosecution and that I must:

1. Withdraw the Section 21 notice in writing immediately.

2. Instruct my agent that no further eviction communications are permitted. Ensure your agent does not attend the property without the tenant’s express agreement.

The council has identified significant damp and mould constituting a Category 1 hazard under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS). This places me at risk of

an Improvement Notice, civil penalties up to £30,000, Emergency Remedial Action costs,

Rent Repayment Orders and I have a legal obligation to rectify these hazards without delay.

I will instruct a qualified damp and mould contractor within 48 hours to assess the property. Then provide the council with the surveyor’s details and proposed timetable for works.
Obviously commence remedial works within 7 days of receiving the surveyor’s report and if the property is deemed unsafe during works, I may be required to provide temporary accommodation so checking my insurance protection with fingers crossed.

As there is no valid Electrical Installation Condition Report (EICR) in place, this is a breach of the Electrical Safety Standards in the Private Rented Sector Regulations 2020. So I must arrange an EICR within 72 hours and provide a copy to both the tenant and the council. Then carry out any remedial works within 28 days or sooner if the report requires urgent action and failure there will cost me if it goes to civil penalties of up to £30,000.

The deposit was not protected in an authorised scheme and was transferred between agents without compliance. This is a breach of the Housing Act 2004 and the tenant is entitled to claim 1–3 times the deposit amount as compensation…so although I cannot eliminate liability, I can mitigate it by acting immediately and:

1. Protect the deposit immediately in a government approved scheme (TDS, DPS or MyDeposits).

2. Serve the Prescribed Information to the tenant within 30 days.

3. Retain evidence of the deposit transfer issues with my former agent.

The property’s EPC rating is F, which means it is unlawful to let without either improving the rating or registering a valid exemption under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) Regulations. Here I must:

1. Commission an EPC improvement plan (insulation, boiler, ventilation measures).

2. Take steps to raise the rating to at least E.

3. Register any applicable exemption on the PRS Exemptions Register. Apparently local authorities now regularly issue penalties of £5,000–£30,000 for MEES breaches.

4. Engage with the council to avoid enforcement.

5. Provide the council with a timetable for repairs, details of my contractors, a copy of my EICR appointment, damp/mould survey booking, EPC improvement plan.

All within shortest time possible and as my agent attempted entry and tried changing the locks, I am at a significant risk of prosecution under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. To reduce that liability, I will send a written apology to the tenant acknowledging the incident, confirm that no eviction action will be taken until legal compliance is complete, terminate the services of the agent responsible and ensure all future contact is in writing only.

It was also strongly recommended that I offer rent abatement during repair works,

reimbursement of medical or cleaning costs linked to damp (if applicable), hotel or temporary accommodation costs and take these proactive steps to reduce the chance of a substantial disrepair claim and limit the value of a rent repayment order.

I was also told that from 2026, the Renters’ Rights Act will fundamentally change possession routes. Section 21 will be abolished and I will need full compliance with deposit protection, repairs, gas and electrical safety, EPC, licensing as failure to bring the property to full legal standard will make possession under Section 8 significantly more difficult.

I advise you that you need to learn some manners and to learn respect for others in this community!

I did as I said I would, my human error was trusting an agent and now solved this so doing what I had already said I would makes your advice redundant, but thank you for trying.

Thanks David and yes all a bit of a mess and not a blame situation, rather a serious one so I contacted a law centre for free professional advice as well and copy pasted most of the response with a few changes to preserve privacy.

They understand a Section 21 notice was served and that my agent issued verbal instructions that the tenant must vacate as well as the attempted lock change.

They advised, the notice is invalid, due to:

failure to protect the tenancy deposit (s213 Housing Act 2004), failure to serve prescribed information, lack of valid electrical safety certification, presence of Category 1 hazards and outstanding disrepair (s33 Deregulation Act 2015 retaliatory eviction provisions). They said attempting to rely on the notice any further exposes me to potential unlawful eviction prosecution and that I must:

1. Withdraw the Section 21 notice in writing immediately.

2. Instruct my agent that no further eviction communications are permitted. Ensuring my agent does not attend the property without the tenant’s express agreement.

The council has identified significant damp and mould constituting a Category 1 hazard under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS). This places me at risk of an Improvement Notice, civil penalties up to £30,000, Emergency Remedial Action costs, Rent Repayment Orders and I have a legal obligation to rectify these hazards without delay.

I will instruct a qualified damp and mould contractor within 48 hours to assess the property. Then provide the council with the surveyor’s details and proposed timetable for works.
Obviously commence remedial works within 7 days of receiving the surveyor’s report and if the property is deemed unsafe during works, I may be required to provide temporary accommodation so checking my insurance protection with fingers crossed.

As there is no valid Electrical Installation Condition Report (EICR) in place, this is a breach of the Electrical Safety Standards in the Private Rented Sector Regulations 2020. So I must arrange an EICR within 72 hours and provide a copy to both the tenant and the council. Then carry out any remedial works within 28 days or sooner if the report requires urgent action and failure there will cost me if it goes to civil penalties of up to £30,000.

The deposit was not protected in an authorised scheme and was transferred between agents without compliance. This is a breach of the Housing Act 2004 and the tenant is entitled to claim 1–3 times the deposit amount as compensation…so although I cannot eliminate liability, I can mitigate it by acting immediately and:

1. Protect the deposit immediately in a government approved scheme (TDS, DPS or MyDeposits).

2. Serve the Prescribed Information to the tenant within 30 days.

3. Retain evidence of the deposit transfer issues with my former agent.

The property’s EPC rating is F, which means it is unlawful to let without either improving the rating or registering a valid exemption under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) Regulations. Here I must:

1. Commission an EPC improvement plan (insulation, boiler, ventilation measures).

2. Take steps to raise the rating to at least E.

3. Register any applicable exemption on the PRS Exemptions Register. Apparently local authorities now regularly issue penalties of £5,000–£30,000 for MEES breaches.

4. Engage with the council to avoid enforcement.

5. Provide the council with a timetable for repairs,

details of my contractors, a copy of my EICR appointment, damp/mould survey booking, EPC improvement plan.

All within shortest time possible and as my agent attempted entry and tried changing the locks, I am at a significant risk of prosecution under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. To reduce that liability, I will send a written apology to the tenant acknowledging the incident, confirm that no eviction action will be taken until legal compliance is complete, terminate the services of the agent responsible and ensure all future contact is in writing only.

It was also strongly recommended that I offer

rent abatement during repair works,

reimbursement of medical or cleaning costs linked to damp (if applicable), hotel or temporary accommodation costs and take these proactive steps to reduce the chance of a substantial disrepair claim and limit the value of a rent repayment order.

I was also told that from 2026, the Renters’ Rights Act will fundamentally change possession routes. Section 21 will be abolished and I will need full compliance with deposit protection, repairs, gas and electrical safety, EPC, licensing as failure to bring the property to full legal standard will make possession under Section 8 significantly more difficult.

1 Like

Will do and thanks as sincerely appreciated!

1 Like

Karl, you obviously have the money to do as you advise but I do not. Stating the obvious without empathy or thought is very easy, but not that useful as you must already know so now receiving the same from me!

Thanks David and yes I contacted a law centre for free professional advice as well and copy pasted most of the response with a few changes to preserve privacy.

They understand a Section 21 notice was served and that my agent issued verbal instructions that the tenant must vacate as well as the attempted lock change.

They advised, the notice is invalid, due to:

failure to protect the tenancy deposit (s213 Housing Act 2004), failure to serve prescribed information, lack of valid electrical safety certification, presence of Category 1 hazards and outstanding disrepair (s33 Deregulation Act 2015 retaliatory eviction provisions). They said attempting to rely on the notice any further exposes me to potential unlawful eviction prosecution and that I must:

1. Withdraw the Section 21 notice in writing immediately.

2. Instruct my agent that no further eviction communications are permitted. Ensuring my agent does not attend the property without the tenant’s express agreement.

The council has identified significant damp and mould constituting a Category 1 hazard under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS). This places me at risk of an Improvement Notice, civil penalties up to £30,000, Emergency Remedial Action costs, Rent Repayment Orders and I have a legal obligation to rectify these hazards without delay.

I will instruct a qualified damp and mould contractor within 48 hours to assess the property. Then provide the council with the surveyor’s details and proposed timetable for works.
Obviously commence remedial works within 7 days of receiving the surveyor’s report and if the property is deemed unsafe during works, I may be required to provide temporary accommodation so checking my insurance protection with fingers crossed.

As there is no valid Electrical Installation Condition Report (EICR) in place, this is a breach of the Electrical Safety Standards in the Private Rented Sector Regulations 2020. So I must arrange an EICR within 72 hours and provide a copy to both the tenant and the council. Then carry out any remedial works within 28 days or sooner if the report requires urgent action and failure there will cost me if it goes to civil penalties of up to £30,000.

The deposit was not protected in an authorised scheme and was transferred between agents without compliance. This is a breach of the Housing Act 2004 and the tenant is entitled to claim 1–3 times the deposit amount as compensation…so although I cannot eliminate liability, I can mitigate it by acting immediately and:

1. Protect the deposit immediately in a government approved scheme (TDS, DPS or MyDeposits).

2. Serve the Prescribed Information to the tenant within 30 days.

3. Retain evidence of the deposit transfer issues with my former agent.

The property’s EPC rating is F, which means it is unlawful to let without either improving the rating or registering a valid exemption under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) Regulations. Here I must:

1. Commission an EPC improvement plan (insulation, boiler, ventilation measures).

2. Take steps to raise the rating to at least E.

3. Register any applicable exemption on the PRS Exemptions Register. Apparently local authorities now regularly issue penalties of £5,000–£30,000 for MEES breaches.

4. Engage with the council to avoid enforcement.

5. Provide the council with a timetable for repairs,

details of my contractors, a copy of my EICR appointment, damp/mould survey booking, EPC improvement plan.

All within shortest time possible and as my agent attempted entry and tried changing the locks, I am at a significant risk of prosecution under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. To reduce that liability, I will send a written apology to the tenant acknowledging the incident, confirm that no eviction action will be taken until legal compliance is complete, terminate the services of the agent responsible and ensure all future contact is in writing only.

It was also strongly recommended that I offer

rent abatement during repair works,

reimbursement of medical or cleaning costs linked to damp (if applicable), hotel or temporary accommodation costs and take these proactive steps to reduce the chance of a substantial disrepair claim and limit the value of a rent repayment order.

I was also told that from 2026, the Renters’ Rights Act will fundamentally change possession routes. Section 21 will be abolished and I will need full compliance with deposit protection, repairs, gas and electrical safety, EPC, licensing as failure to bring the property to full legal standard will make possession under Section 8 significantly more difficult.

You’ve obviously misread my post, as it didn’t involve spending money. You have already spoken to a law professional for free, as stated in your post. And the recommendation to check the credentials of the expert agent you are now employing, may seem obvious, but you didn’t do it before, so it wasn’t that obvious to you.

My post was not disrespectful, your reply was.

I would add, I don’t come here to argue, I come here to engage and offer advice, which is what I did. As it isn’t appreciated in this instance, I will mute this chat and not engage further.

You are obviously one of those who feels his tone, and obvious advice is respectful, so I will help you @Karl11 by quoting you and advising you of a different view:

  1. You said “We are all responsible for the ‘professionals’ we employ.” at best a very obvious statement to make to any adult so not useful. Also why it was made can reasonably be seen as a disrespectful “telling off”, which for me makes it just condescending and not useful.
  2. You said “You need to check the credentials of the expert letting / management agent you are now employing, and also check with a solicitor where you stand legally re the current situation.” again at best a very obvious statement to make to any adult so not useful. Also why it was made can reasonably be seen as a disrespectful “telling off” and again just condescending and not useful.
  3. Obviously solicitors do not work for free and as a professional can and mostly do charge what is for me a high fee so rather than use free resources such as law centers, citizens advice and others to check my legal situation I made what turned out to be a poor judgement call; I trusted the agent.

You also later posted “You’ve obviously misread my post, as it didn’t involve spending money. You have already spoken to a law professional for free, as stated in your post. And the recommendation to check the credentials of the expert agent you are now employing, may seem obvious, but you didn’t do it before, so it wasn’t that obvious to you.” which again is not helpful at all:

  1. “You’ve obviously misread my post, as it didn’t involve spending money.” Read point 3 above as it applies here!
  2. “You have already spoken to a law professional for free, as stated in your post.” that is correct and again read point 3 above as it applies here!
  3. “And the recommendation to check the credentials of the expert agent you are now employing, may seem obvious, but you didn’t do it before, so it wasn’t that obvious to you.” Not sure what you are rambling about here as I did the obvious of terminating my relationship with them as I think I said before. It was a priority to get a decent agent onboard straight away which I did and had I not it was in my legal advice from the law centre. I thought I mentioned that in one of my posts, but you are clearly of the opinion things are “obvious” so probably did not think that through or maybe didn’t read my post!

@barrybartram glad my suggestions not a million miles from advice you’ve received elsewhere and it is to take various remedial action. This must be stressful for you and the tenant and well done for sharing. It’s a reminder to all of us that what can go wrong..does. And that if we use agents or third parties to carry out services for us, we need to mark their homework / check they do stuff properly as much as we can. As others have apparently said, agents are a bit of a wild west. Tradesmen aren’t all great either.

Ps doubt @Karl11 meant to offend nor you to be disrespectful. I’ve seen @Karl11 give a lot of advice here and he evidently tries to help . He is more pithy than some (me!). I’ve made my share of mistakes when writing in online or by email. I suspect you’ve more serious things to worry about and spend time on than anyone here’s replies.

Good luck

Thanks David and definitely a lesson learned as new to this so dropped the ball. I thought it was worth sharing for other new landlords who may be under financial pressures like I am at the moment. It spells out the consequences of the wrong decision at the time. My mind was on securing work, which I did and as we know solicitors do not work for free and as a professional can and mostly do charge what is for me a high fee. I made the error of rather than using free resources such as law centers, citizens advice and others to check my legal situation I made what turned out to be a poor judgement call; I trusted the agent.

To be fair to agents as I am sure you were not saying this either, not all agents will be quite so incompetent. Whilst going through other things with my tenant we are creating a file to send to the relevant authority. I perceive it will fall into a huge backlog due to our country’s current economic circumstances but I am sure it will help somebody in the future.

Thanks again for your kind help that was/is sincerely appreciated.

1 Like

If it’s so obvious then why use the following excuse?

The advice I gave was serious. The letting agent you engaged has utterly failed in their duties. The fact that this is your responsibility is, as you say, “a very obvious statement to make to any adult”. Forgive me for stating that it’s just as obvious that you owe your tenants considerable compensation because you are ultimately responsible for housing vulnerable people in conditions detrimental to their health. Hopefully, you’ll do the right thing and pay for them to move into safe accommodation as soon as possible. If you truly care about housing people properly, that should be your priority.

1 Like

@tatemono @barrybartram

““We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.” [George Orwell]

… and… have a lovely evening :slight_smile:

1 Like