I have been looking for some answers regarding HMO licence specifically some context are not exactly clear. So far I can understand that HMO licence is required if you need to rent property to 3 or more individuals which form 2 or more house holds sharing kitechen and bathroom.
I have a scenario where my prospective tenant and his wife will be main contractable tenant and his cousin is sharing the house to live with his wife. So they are 4 adults but can they be considered as single house hold due to related cousins? Do I need to apply for HMO?
The property is a 3 bed house with 1 bathroom (separate toilet and bathroom) and a kitchen.
I am not going to let them separately but just a family or cousins who want to share cost.
This unique scenario does appear to be a grey area. The law isnāt clear. I think you could argue that they are one family. If it was me I would let it without a license. You mention one of them being the main tenant, if so this may be a work around with the main couple on the tenancy and the other couple permitted occupiers contributing to the bills.
They said cousins but Iām not sure how can I prove as they are first cousins. Mentioning them as approved member as cousins in contract can be enough?
Iām sure itās common where migrant professionals sharing house with cousins to save money.
Hi Raya,
for what itās worth, Govnāt Deptsā. themselves donāt appear to be consistent. As Chris and David say, on the face of it, itās one household. Iām sure, though,that many tenants simply use the term ācousinā very freely!
When someone previously raised the question here, Iād enquired of DLUHC re: how many generations of relatives were included as acceptable family, as follows:
Private Rental Sector - There appears to be an anomaly between the Housing Act 2004 and the Gov.uk site - as regards what degree of ārelativeā is considered to be a family member [when considering HMOās].
Housing Act extract:- https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/34/section/258/enacted?view=interweave Gov.uk appears to extend a family member only to a SECOND degree relative - whilst the Housing Act extends partially to THIRD degree relatives (i.e. it INCLUDES a cousin - but EXCLUDES Great-Grandparents). Q) Can you please advise if the Gov.uk site needs amending - and provide consistency/clarification for PRS Landlords, please?
I didnāt feel their response was helpful/clear; they enact the law, then state they canāt comment and advise you to seek legal advice!
Thank you for your email to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and
Communities. I have been asked to respond as this matter falls within my policy
area. Ministers and their officials are unable to give legal advice or comment on
individual cases.
On investigating your issue Ms Kincaid, the guidance on the Gov.uk webpage, linked
here Private renting: Houses in multiple occupation - GOV.UK, is intended to
give some of the examples as a general idea. You can find the longer list of
examples in the Housing Act (2004), which I have linked below for ease. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/34/section/258/enacted?view=interweave
These do not contradict each other and as a result we will not need to change the
guidance on the Gov.uk webpage. If you have concerns with anyone defined outside
of the examples given on either links, in your particular case a āgreat-grandparentā, I
recommend you seek advice from a legal professional.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write into the department and I hope this
information is of use to you.
Thanks all for your valuable inputs. Sorry for delay in reply due to holiday.
Section 258 mentions cousins to identify as relative. However, council doesnāt mention cousins in there example of relatives.
is it landlordās responsibility to check how are they related? Isnāt a declaration from tenant mentioning their status as cousin/relative not enough to cover?
If you get a signed and possibly witnessed statement from each specifying the exact relationship then its probably sufficient to cover you against prosecution or RRO. However if it turned out that they were not related, you would still have to get an HMO licence.